KRAUSE’S GROVE, 2 Beach Road, Halfmoon, NY


1:00 PM TO 6:00 PM ~ RAIN OR SHINE

$30.00 per adult ticket at gate - $20.00 for children under 12

includes donation to Harvard Stem Cell Institute.

5 hour picnic with soda, beer, games, raffles, 50/50, live music




Abundant food and dessert being served 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Those who wish to join a pre-picnic motorcycle cavalcade around the beautiful Tomhannock Reservoir in Ali’s honor will meet at the Troy Plaza on Hoosick Street at 10:00 A.M. for sign up and the cavalcade will kick off at 11:00 A.M. sharp.

For more info: https://www.facebook.com/Rally4Ali

For Further Information


For the Run, Wally Urzan


For the Picnic & Cause

Alison Fisk


Thursday, December 29, 2011

3 arrested on stem cell charges

Published: Dec. 28, 2011 at 10:47 PM
Comments (0)
SAN ANTONIO, Dec. 28 (UPI) -- The FBI said Wednesday it arrested three men for their alleged roles in an operation that made stem cells and sold them to sick people without federal approval.
A fourth suspect remained at large, the FBI said in a release posted on its Web site.
The suspects in custody were identified as Francisco Morales, 52, of Brownsville, Texas; Alberto Ramon, 48, of Del Rio, Texas; and Vincent Dammai, 40, of Mount Pleasant, S.C. Morales was arrested Dec. 22, while Ramon and Dammai were arrested Tuesday.
The FBI said an arrest warrant had been issued for Lawrence Stowe, 58, of Dallas, who remained at large.
"This investigation identified a scheme whereby the suffering and hopes of victims in extreme medical need were used and manipulated for personal profit," FBI Special Agent in Charge Cory Nelson said. "The predatory and opportunistic nature of the crimes alleged in this indictment mirrors images from science fiction."
Federal authorities allege the four conspired to commit mail fraud and unlawfully distributed stem cells derived from umbilical cord blood. Morales and the others are accused of manufacturing, distributing and using stems cells produced from umbilical cord blood to perform procedures not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, to treat people who have cancer, amytrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis and other autoimmune diseases.
FDA approval is required before stem cells can be marketed to the public and used to treat incurable diseases. The FDA has not determined stem cells are safe and effective in treating these diseases.
The indictment alleges that from 2007 to 2010 Morales falsely portrayed himself as a doctor who operated a medical clinic named Rio Valley Medical Clinic in Brownsville. He allegedly would meet patients in the United States and then travel to Mexico to perform the stem cell procedures.
Stowe allegedly marketed, promoted and sold stem cells along with other drug and biological products that don't have FDA approval for the treatment of cancer, ALS, MS and Parkinson's disease. Stowe ran The Stowe Foundation and Stowe Biotherapy Inc.
Ramon, a licensed midwife who operated The Maternity Care Clinic in Del Rio, allegedly obtained umbilical cord blood from birth mothers who were his patients and sold it to Global Laboratories. The Scottsdale, Ariz., company then allegedly sold the tissue to Dammai, a professor of pathology and laboratory medicine in Charleston, who allegedly created stem cells later sold by Global Laboratories.

Read more: http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2011/12/28/3-arrested-on-stem-cell-charges/UPI-21691325130464/#ixzz1hx1vSyiz


When stroke patients do not receive immediate care the chances of suffering paralysis, disturbances to speech and impaired vision increase. A new stem cell therapy aims to reverse the effects a stroke has on the body.

At first glance, the sheep in the compound of Leipzig's faculty of veterinary medicine look like your ordinary sheep. But if you take a closer look, you see that parts of them have been sheared.

"We took cells from iliac crest and we can't run the risk of contamination," explained Johannes Boltze, head of the Department of Cell Therapy at Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology in Leipzig.

The sheep's bone marrow contains stem cells that can transform into a variety of types of cells and which form the basis for the new therapy researchers are putting to the test.

Scientists in Leipzig have already triggered a stroke in some of the sheep while others still await their fate. It's impossible to tell at first glance which of the sheep sufferedd a stroke.

"Just a couple days after the stroke, they don't feel the difference anymore," Boltze said. "The sheep is not impaired in its daily life."

Certain tests, however, can document the subsequent damage. The scientists examine their sheep in a nuclear spin and a positron emission tomography (PET).

And they run different behavioral tests, because the sheep's course of motions is impaired after a stroke - just as it is in humans. The scientists pull away one of the sheep's forelegs. A healthy sheep immediately corrects its stance in order to stand on all fours again. But sheep that had a stroke show a delayed response or don't react at all. 

Can stem cells alleviate damages caused by a stroke?

Testing of the researchers' treatment began on lab rats and has been extended to sheep. Shortly after a stroke, the researchers give the animal an injection of immune cells and stem cells. Rats without the injection were not able to balance on a small bar whereas treated rats ran back and forth without a problem.

Sheep serve as substantially better testing grounds. But the quite positive results at the beginning have become ever more infrequent since the scientists started to conduct blind studies in which scientists do not know whether a sheep was treated with a stem cell injection.

Neurons under the microscopeAbout 30,000 cells can die each second when blood vessels to the brain are clogged
"None of the scientists was deliberately altering the results, but your own expectations do have an impact," said Boltze. Now, the positive results have decreased, but the scientists hope that the remaining results are even more significant and can be easily transferred to the human body.  

Currently, tests have called for injecting stem cells of the same animal. The next step will be to transfer human cells into the sheep. At one of Fraunhofer's laboratories, Alexandra Stolzing tries to recover stem cells from human skin. The difficultly is that skin cells do not naturally have the ability to form other types of cells. In order to work as stem cells, they need to be forced to "forget" the transformation they underwent to become a specific cell type. They need to be reset to be able to transform into another type of cell, such as a nerve cell.

The reprogramming is a complicated process that is affected by a number of factors, including the age and condition of a cell and the medium in which the process is due to take place. The researchers have just begun to understand the details. It's an exciting process that could go beyond being beneficial for stroke research.

"I work in the field of ageing research and it's fascinating to me that a cell can be brought back to a state that can be considered young," Stolzing said.

Still a long way to go

The scientists are still working to understand exactly what influence the stem cells have on the body. They know so far that the cells don't wander to the brain, build new neurons and replace the impaired tissue. This process would take at least four weeks, but the positive results of the stem cell injection shows after about a week, said Boltze.

"We assume that the cells block certain secondary complications, affect inflammation and minimize cell death," Boltze said, adding that stem cell therapy could become an important part of stroke treatment plans. "Maybe in total the result will be slightly better as without the stem cells."

The key is still how fast the patient reaches a proper clinic so that the blood clot in the brain can quickly be dissolved. Boltze consistently gets requests from patients that he cannot meet both for ethical and medical reasons. Since the methods are still in animal trials, Boltze cannot use them on human patients, and there is no established way to transfer stem cells to humans within the short three-day window after a stroke that the tests require.

Scientists in the United States have already started the first clinical trials and others are set to begin in Germany in 2012. But even if all trials are successful, in will take at least 10 years until the stem cell therapy will be available. In any case, preventing a stroke is better than treating one, said Boltze.

"Medicines are not the best solution," Boltze said. "The best solution is a healthy lifestyle. Don't smoke, drink only a little alcohol and exercise. That's more beneficial than any stem cell."

Author: Claudia Ruby / sst
Editor: Sean Sinico

Thursday, December 15, 2011

The Irish Times - Thursday, December 15, 2011

Overcoming stem cell research difficulties

PROPONENTS OF human embryonic stem cell research (HESCR) pitched their case for support on the basis that it would lead to cures in the relatively near term for a wide range of devastating human diseases.
Many people who have serious ethical qualms about HESCR were persuaded to stay quiet and to pay a “relatively small ethical price” for this dazzling medical potential. But suddenly all has changed – HESCR has entered very stormy waters and prospects that this approach will achieve significant medical cures, even in the medium term, have dramatically diminished. The story is summarised by Andy Coghlan in New Scientis t on November 18th, 2011.
Embryonic stem cells are pluripotent – they can turn into any of the more than 200 cell types found in human tissues. These embryonic stem cells therefore have great theoretical potential to repair and regenerate failing human tissue, thereby curing a wide variety of human diseases. However, HESCR confronts ethical and technical difficulties.
Human embryos must be killed in order to obtain human embryonic stem cells, but many people believe that the human embryo has the inherent right not to be deliberately destroyed. Many others, of course, including many scientists, do not share this position.
Ethics aside, it has proven to be extremely difficult to reliably coax embryonic stem cells to develop along a chosen path. For example, if you introduce embryonic stem cells into ailing nervous tissue, hoping that the cells will develop into healthy nerves, there is a significant chance that the cells will instead develop into another tissue type or perhaps into a cancerous tumour.
As a result, progress with embryonic stem cells has been very slow. Not only have no medical cures come out of this research to date but almost no clinical trials of potential cures have resulted. The California-based Geron Corporation, the largest biotechnology company dealing with stem cells, launched a trial of human embryonic cell treatment of spinal cord injuries about a year ago, but pulled out of the trial in November in favour of continuing research on new cancer drugs. To my knowledge, there is only one remaining clinical trial worldwide involving HESCR.
Proponents of HESCR now emphasise the value of this research in the study of human development. This is fundamental or “blue skies” research, quite different to the applied medical research used before to sell HESCR to public and political audiences. However, exactly the same ethical objection applies as before – human embryos must be killed to obtain the embryonic stem cells.
The good news is that two other stem cell options are available to medicine. One approach uses induced pluripotent stem cells (IPSC) and the other approach uses adult stem cells (ASCs). In 2005 Shinya Yamanaka of Kyoto University discovered how to induce ordinary cells to change into embryonic-like stem cells with the pluripotent potential to generate a large range of body tissues. These IPSCs are acceptable to those who oppose HESCR on ethical grounds. However, just as in HESCR, much difficult work remains to be done to develop the medical potential of induced pluripotent stem cells.
Most adult tissues in the body have their ASCs, which are not pluripotent but multipotent – they have the capacity to change into a limited range of tissue types. However, they are relatively easy to prepare, they are predictable and unlikely to form tumours.
Research using ASCs has been underway for many years. Successful medical treatments have been developed and about 200 clinical trials using ASC treatments are underway worldwide. The Australian company Mesoblast is using injections of adult stem cells to develop treatments for diabetes, bone disease, heart attacks and eyes.
Adult stem cells are now clearly leading the way clinically in terms of success rate, trial numbers and commercial potential. Some medical success could still come from HESCR if companies decide to invest heavily and take the risk. Treatments based on the new IPSCs are the furthest from the clinic but a massive research effort is underway and we can expect rapid progress here.

William Reville is a professor in the Biochemistry Department and public awareness of science officer at UCC. understandingscience.ucc.ie

Sunday, December 4, 2011

Relief for stem cell transplant patients

Wednesday, November 30, 2011 - 17:50 in Health & Medicine
In a study that seems to pivot on a paradox, scientists at Harvard-affiliated Dana-Farber Cancer Institute have used an immune system stimulant as an immune system suppressor to treat a common, often debilitating side effect of donor stem cell transplantation in cancer patients.  The effect, in some cases, was profound. The phase 1 study, published in the Dec. 1 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, involved allogeneic (donor) stem cell transplant patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a multisystem inflammatory condition that arises when donor immune system cells launch an attack on a patient’s own tissues, leading to varied symptoms such as skin rash and thickened or scarred skin, lung inflammation, or hepatitis, among others.  The patients received once-daily injections of interleukin-2 (IL-2), a drug traditionally used to spur an immune system attack, but which, at low doses, investigators had reason to believe, could have the opposite effect in this case:...

Read the whole article on Harvard Science

More from Harvard Science